Antagonistic Pleiotropy Theory |
||
|
|
|
Figure 7: Unlike the mutation
accumulation theory the genes suggested to be involved with the ageing
phenotype in the pleiotropy theory are beneficial early in life (Kirkwood and
Austad, 2000). |
Description Another theory, first proposed
by George Williams to explain how aging occurs, concerns genes which change
their effects over time (Gavrilov and Gavrilova, 2002).
The pleiotropy theory (AP) states that alleles displaying beneficial effects
in youth by conferring a fitness advantage would be strongly selected for in
nature even if these same alleles had a detrimental effect on survival late
in life (Kirkwood, 2002;
and others). This is because
natural selection could fix the beneficial alleles early in life without
predicting their negative consequences later. The implication of this line of
reasoning is that ageing is ultimately a trade-off between fitness and
survival. |
|
|
|
|
Evidence The pleiotropy and mutation
accumulation models are not necessarily mutually exclusive nor are they
necessarily an exhaustive explanation for the trend of gradual decrease in fitness
with age. Many predictions from the two models are the same. For example,
ageing rates will be faster when there are greater risks of death in the
adult (Partridge and
Gems, 2006). Experimental evidence for pleiotropic genes
are obtained from comparative studies and artificial selection experiments (Hughes et al,
2002). In one such study, artificially selected long-lived Drosophila variants increased the
temporal survival of progeny while reducing early age fecundity (Partridge et
al., 1999). Further evidence of genes which
exhibit pleiotropic effects are observed in long-lived mutants. |
A
circular reasoning for why ageing exists Reasoning from AP and MA theories can explain why ageing occurs. In a theoretical non-ageing population one would still expect to see increased mortality with age due to extrinsic factors. The consequences of age related mortality are positive feedback loops leading to reduced reproduction over time. The reduced reproduction at late ages further decreases the power for selection. This lack of selection results in increasing frequencies of deleterious mutations over time which then increases mortality as well. In light of this type of reasoning, the existence of ageing is not a paradox and seems inevitable in most populations (Hughes and Reynolds, 2005). However, recent work on possible negative senescence has called the inevitability of ageing into some question (Williams et al., 2006). |
|
|
|
|